No One Cares About High Fashion

Can manner e'er be sustainable?

(Image credit:

Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld

)

Fashion accounts for around 10% of greenhouse gas emissions from human being activity, but there are ways to reduce the impact your wardrobe has on the climate.

"For years I was obsessed with ownership clothes," says Snezhina Piskova. "I would buy 10 pairs of very inexpensive jeans just for the sake of having more variety in my wardrobe for a low cost, fifty-fifty though I ended up wearing simply two or three of them."

When information technology comes to resisting the lure of manner, Piskova faces a tougher challenge than about. As a copywriter for a company in the fashion industry she'southward surrounded past fashionistas. And information technology's been like shooting fish in a barrel to go along with the tide.

Only conversations about the climate crisis made Piskova, who lives in Sofia, Republic of bulgaria, consider the impact that the industry and her own shopping habits were having.

The fashion industry accounts for about 8-10% of global carbon emissions, and nearly 20% of wastewater. And while the environmental impact of flight is now well known, mode sucks upwards more than energy than both aviation and aircraft combined.

You might also like:

● Should y'all go along a "flight nutrition"?
● Why your bin is a climate trouble
● The surprising toll of being online

Clothing in general has circuitous supply chains that makes it difficult to business relationship for all of the emissions that come from producing a pair of trousers or new coat. And so in that location is how the clothing is transported and tending of when the consumer no longer wants it anymore.

The fashion manufacture is responsible for more carbon emissions than those that come up from aviation (Credit: Getty Images/Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld)

While most consumer goods suffer from similar issues, what makes the fashion industry particularly problematic is the frenetic footstep of modify it not just undergoes, merely encourages. With each passing flavor (or microseason), consumers are pushed into buying the latest items to stay on trend.

It's hard to visualise all of the inputs that go into producing garments, but permit's accept denim as an case. The UN estimates that a single pair of jeans requires a kilogram of cotton. And because cotton tends to be grown in dry environments, producing this kilo requires near vii,500–x,000 litres of water. That's nearly 10 years' worth of drinking water for one person.

There are ways to make denim less resource-intensive, just in general, jeans composed of textile that is as close to the natural country of cotton as possible utilise less water and hazardous treatments to produce. This means less bleaching, less sandblasting, and less pre-washing.

Unfortunately it as well means that some of the most popular types of jeans are the hardest on the planet. For instance, fabric dyes pollute water bodies, with devastating effects on aquatic life and drinking water. And the stretchy elastane material woven through many trendy styles of tight jeans is made using synthetic materials derived from plastic, which reduces recyclability and increases the environmental touch farther.

Jeans manufacturer Levi Strauss estimates that a pair of its iconic 501 jeans will produce the equivalent of 33.4kg of carbon dioxide equivalent across its entire lifespan – about the same as driving 69 miles in the average US motorcar. Just over a third of those emissions come up from the fibre and fabric product, while another 8% is from cut, sewing and finishing the jeans. Packaging, send and retail accounts for sixteen% of the emissions while the remaining twoscore% is from consumer apply – mainly from washing the jeans – and disposal in landfill.

Another report of jeans made in India that independent 2% elastane showed that producing the fibres and denim cloth released 7kg more carbon than those in Levi'southward analysis. It suggests that choosing raw denim products will have less impact on the climate.

But it is also possible to look for further means of reducing the impact of your jeans by looking at the label. Certification programmes like the Meliorate Cotton fiber Initiative and Global Organic Material Standard tin help consumers work out how light-green their denim is (although these programmes aren't perfect – many suffer from a lack of funding and the circuitous supply chains for cotton fiber tin make it hard to account where it all comes from).

Growing the cotton fiber needed for a single pair of jeans requires a huge amount of water, while dying and manufacturing processes apply yet more (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

Some manufacturers are too working on means to reduce the environmental affect from the product of their jeans, while others have been developing means of recycling denim or even jeans that will decompose inside a few months when composted.

It'due south not cotton, but the synthetic polymer polyester that is the most common material used in wearable. Globally, "65% of the vesture that we wear is polymer-based", says Lynn Wilson, an expert on the circular economy, who for her PhD research at the University of Glasgow is focusing on consumer behaviour related to clothing disposal.

Around seventy million barrels of oil a year are used to make polyester fibres in our apparel. From waterproof jackets to delicate scarves, it'due south extremely hard to get away from the stuff. Part of this stems from the convenience – polyester is easy to clean and durable. It is besides lightweight and inexpensive.

But a shirt made from polyester has double the carbon footprint compared to one fabricated from cotton fiber. A polyester shirt produces the equivalent of 5.5kg of carbon dioxide compared to 2.1kg from a cotton shirt.

Swapping wearing apparel with friends can refresh your wardrobe and bring an interesting new dimension to your friendship (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

A simple fashion to reduce the footprint from online shopping then is to only lodge what we really desire and intend to keep. According to the World Banking company, 40% of clothing purchased in some countries is never used.

Piskova has tried to move abroad from the fast fashion civilization herself by learning to appreciate what she already has rather than what she could take. But detaching herself from a fashion-obsessed mindset hasn't been piece of cake. To assist, Piskova resists going to places where she feels pressure to consume, such as shopping malls. She besides periodically swaps clothes with her friends, which not simply allows them to refresh their own wardrobes but also helps them experience closer to each other. And she has also learned to embrace minor blemishes on her dress, rather than seeing these every bit an excuse to buy more.

"People are and then careful with their clothes, like to not have any scratches on them or accept whatsoever holes or whatever," says Piskova. "But and so when you think about it, that's role of the clothes. You recollect that one time when yous went to a festival, where you ripped your shirt or something similar that, and it'due south a nice memory."

The number of times you wear an item of clothing can make a large difference too in its overall carbon footprint. Enquiry past scientists at the Chalmers Establish of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, found that an average cotton t-shirt might release only over 2kg of carbon dioxide equivalent into the atmosphere while a polyester dress would release the equivalent of virtually 17kg of carbon dioxide.

Sometimes the best way to reduce the bear on your fashion choices have on the environment is break gratuitous of the herd (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

They estimated, still, that the boilerplate t-shirt in Sweden is worn effectually 22 times in a yr, while the average clothes is worn just x times. This would mean the amount of carbon released per wear is many times college for the dress.

According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the average number of times a piece of clothing is worn decreased by 36% between 2000 and 2015. In the same catamenia, clothing production doubled. These gains came at the expense of the quality and longevity of the garments.

A number of public surveys likewise advise that many of usa accept clothes in our wardrobes that we hardly ever wear. According to ane survey, nigh half of the clothes in the average Great britain person's wardrobe are never worn, primarily considering they no longer fit or have gone out of fashion. Another plant that a fifth of the items endemic past US consumers are unworn.

It is clear that investing in college-quality clothing, wearing them more than often and holding onto them for longer, is the non-and so-secret weapon for combatting the carbon footprint from your garments. In the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, standing to actively wear a garment for simply nine months longer could diminish its environmental impacts past 20–thirty%.

Naturally, some clothing companies have sniffed out an opportunity hither. Clothing rental services, for instance, are especially appealing in a social-media era where some people are reluctant to exist seen online wearing the same outfit more than one time. For those who want to await proficient in their online photos simply accept even less of an impact on the environment, in that location is the ephemeral trend for digital fashion, or clothing designed to only appear online by being superimposed onto your images.

Buying less too means caring for clothes more. Websites like Honey Your Clothes, set up by UK recycling charity WRAP, offer tips on repairing and extending the life of dress, which can reduce the carbon footprint of the apparel.

Simply tackling the underlying reasons for why we over-purchase, yet underuse, clothes could also assistance. In a consumerist club, people are trained to find fast style pleasurable and addictive.

"A lot of the things that we purchase fulfil some kind of part in ourselves – particularly fashion items," says Mike Kyrios, a clinical psychologist who researches mental disorders at Australia's Flinders University. People who take lower cocky-esteem or worry most their status are specially probable to apply overspending equally a route to feel like they "belong", he explains. As are people who are sensitive to rewards – indeed the reward centres in the brain are those near activated by impulse shopping.

Online shopping also means that the impulse to buy is harder to control, as internet stores are open 24/seven – including, every bit Kyrios says, the times "when your controlling capabilities are at their minimum".

Though estimates vary, 1 is that about 5% of the population exhibits compulsive buying behaviour. "The problem is it'due south well hidden," says Kyrios. "People don't show up for treatment, people don't acknowledge it's a problem."

One solution might be to just ration the time you spend looking at clothes online, but peradventure a better arroyo is to find less wasteful ways of achieving the sense of reward that over-spenders are seeking. Mainstream consumers can scratch their crawling for new dress past buying from vintage and secondhand clothing shops.

Wearing our garments for even just a few months longer can reduce the impact they have on the planet (Credit: Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld)

"Secondhand clothing is giving clothes a second life and it's slowing down that fast-manner cycle," says Fee Gilfeather, a sustainable fashion expert at charity Oxfam. "And then I would say secondhand (clothing) is actually one of the solutions to the overconsumption challenge."

Cutting down on washing can also help to further reduce the carbon footprint of your wardrobe, while also helping to lower water use and the number of microfibres shed in the washing machine.

"You don't demand to launder wearing apparel equally ofttimes as you might think," says Gilfeather. She hangs some of her dresses out to air, for example, rather than washing them after each article of clothing. "Reducing the amount of washing that yous need to do is the best way of making certain that the plastics don't get into the water organisation."

How you dispose of the apparel at the end of their useful life is also important. Throwing them abroad so they finish upwardly in landfill or beingness incinerated simply leads to more than emissions. Perhaps the all-time approach is to pass them on to friends or take them to clemency shops if they are still good enough to be worn. However, individuals should be careful not to utilise this equally a fashion of immigration space simply to purchase new apparel, which Wilson's research suggests is common.

Where wear has been worn or damaged beyond repair, the near environmentally sound mode of disposing them is to transport them for recycling. Article of clothing recycling is still relatively new for many fabrics just increasingly cotton wool and polyester wear can now exist turned into new clothes or other items. Some major manufacturers have now started using recycled fabrics, but it is oftentimes hard for consumers to notice places to accept their old dress.

Many of the changes needed to make clothing more sustainable have to exist implemented by the manufacturers and big companies that control the manner industry. Just as consumers the changes we all make in our behaviour not only add upwards, just can drive change in the industry, too.

Co-ordinate to Gilfeather, we can all brand a deviation by being more thoughtful as consumers.

--

Smart Guide to Climate change

For most BBC Future readers, the question of whether climatic change is happening is no longer something that needs to exist asked. Instead, there is now growing concern most what each of us as individuals can do about it. This new series, our Smart Guide to Climate change, uses scientific research and information to break downwardly the most effective strategies each of us can take to shrink our carbon footprint.

--

Bring together one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow u.s. on Twitter  or Instagram .

If y'all liked this story, sign upwardly for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "The Essential Listing". A handpicked pick of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Share this post